When a commissioner was appointed to the Water and Sewer Board, the joint board claimed that the appointment is not valid as no notice was given of the meeting at which the appointment was made.

MTAS was asked to interpret a vote when a majority vote of the membership of the board is required as opposed to a quorum of the present members.

MTAS was asked about the importance of adopting language to indemnify city officers, employees, and board members while properly acting in the scope of their official duties.

MTAS provided information on special events, plus, a few examples of policies, applications, permits, ordinances, and forms.

MTAS researched the issue of whether the records of an internal investigation (non-criminal at this point) by the police department of one its employees are subject to public disclosure pursuant to the Tennessee Public Records Act ("TPRA"), subject to a statutory exception, or are otherwise privileged.

MTAS was asked whether it is legal to require police officer candidates to move into the city if they are hired.

MTAS was asked whether there has been a case where a fire chaplain program has been challenged on establishment clause grounds.

MTAS was asked the advantages and disadvantages of forming a municipal Industrial Development Corporation.

MTAS was asked about the constitutionality of prohibiting solicitations after dark and placing "prior restraints" on such solicitations (such as a fifteen day waiting period during which time the police chief does a background check on the applicant).

MTAS was asked for a brief opinion with respect to the authority of local governments to enter into collective bargaining agreements with various employees.