Brush collection/disposal operations study [draft]
MTAS appreciates the opportunity to work with the City of Knoxville on evaluation of its brush
collection/disposal operations. This report provides:
Descriptions of services in Knoxville and _ other selected cities.
Notes on the differences in operations from city to city. It is very difficult to obtain 'apples to apples' comparisons on brush handling operations because the use of manpower, duties of personnel, type and ownership of equipment, disposal methods and other factors vary widely.
A list of best management practices already implemented or planned for the future by the managers that MTAS interviewed.
Charts showing operational efficiency and cost information for the cities in this report.
A few recommendations for Knoxville Public Services managers to consider.
In comparison with other cities MTAS interviewed, Knoxvflle has room to gain efficiency in
collection of brush without decreasing the level of service. There are definitely opportunities to gain more cost effective wood waste grinding and disposal services. Those opportunities need to be explored through a request for proposals (RFP) process and internal cost analyses.
State and local governments should use the codes published by the International Code Council, the National Fire Protection Association, and Underwriters Laboratories as their building standards.
The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (P.L. 103-66), enacted in August 1993, changed the collection point for the excise taxes on diesel fuel to the same as gasoline.